Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Winners Chapel Munich

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Winners Chapel Munich


Declined 11 times, which is nearly a record. No real likelihood of an article  DGG ( talk ) 03:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think reviewers need to STOP talking about INLINE CITATIONS. They are NOT required for mainspace, and no addition of inline citations can help a draft of an unsuitable topic like this. It’s hard to give an objective statement as to why this topic can never be suitable, but “inline citation” is definitely not close to a meaningful explanation. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * My suggestion of a better rejecting review comment is like my suggestion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_60. Ask the author to state which 2 or 3 sources best meet our inclusion criteria of reliable third party secondary source coverage directly discussing the topic. “More sources”, inline or not, do not help and just make it harder to review. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, draft creator is ignoring the suggestions of multiple editors and instead just robotically resubmitting without making much improvement. Pages like this clog up and already incredibly backlogged queue. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I was considering nominating the draft for deletion myself, for similar reasons as and . -- I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  00:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I just turned it down again. Nearly zero chance a page about a local church founded in 2016 is going to pass Notability. We should salt the title while we are at it on closing, or this tenacious editor will recreate. Legacypac (talk) 07:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Being declined 12 times in 2 months, including 8 times in less than 3 weeks is ridiculous. If recreated in the near future, definitely salt to ECP. No chance of passing.  J 947 ( c ) (m)   01:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.