Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Wombo draft

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 21:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wombo draft


WP:STALEDRAFT of no potential that would be problematic even if blanked. Non-notable term. North America1000 10:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Junk Legacypac (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * what about this is so problematic that it cannot just be blanked? VQuakr (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * One reason probably is it's in draftspace so why keep it around? This isn't some user's page, it's the equivalent of the common area. If someone dumped nonsense in Wikipedia space, template space, project space, mainspace, talk space, it's perfectly fair to delete it and not just blank it. It's borderline vandalism and blanking it to hope that the vandal has learned their lesson about not creating nonsense is naive. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wombo has been deleted six times since 2007 and SALTed since 2008. Draft:Wombo is similarly idiotic and is further evidence why blanking these pages just encourages the idiocy. I've added it to this MFD to save time. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.