Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Woody Woodpecker and Friends (MeTV)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Woody Woodpecker and Friends (MeTV)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a draft, and drafts are not deleted for notability. This is not a case of web hosting because this is a good faith draft, although it will not be accepted in its current condition.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete there are no references and most likely there never will be since it was created in 2023. Catfurball (talk) 18:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a case of web hosting because the editor has been updating this retrospective TV guide for months, the creator is aware that the content is not suitable for the encyclopedia (it was created as an article, was moved to draft, and the creator was notified), the nature of the topic written about is such that it invites updates, and the types of changes made (additions to a schedule of airings) are not qualitative changes of the sort that show that the user is interested in this becoming an article. So there is evidence of a mens rea of pursuing a "personal project unrelated to Wikipedia" (WP:NOTWEBHOST#5), and we don't need to call this bad-faith activity, but it can't be seen as a "good faith draft" as says either. As it's uncertain when this will become eligible for G13 and it could be a long time in the future, deletion is an appropriate response. While draftspace can accommodate many things, it can not accommodate personal projects that are not similar to anything that could be included in the encyclopedia and are not related to Wikipedia's goals.—Alalch E. 10:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - A review of the originator's usage shows that they are using Wikipedia to do very little except maintain these lists of TV episodes in draft space. Although these look like plausible drafts, it is clear from their whole usage pattern that they are doing little but recording their TV watching.  They have had a week in which to explain, but maybe the explanation is the obvious one, which is a form of web hosting.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.