Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Yee Woon Chee

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The SandDoctor Talk 23:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Yee Woon Chee

 * ~ Winged Blades Godric 08:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ~ Winged Blades Godric 08:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Long abandoned bio created back in 2016. No sources so we can't create the page via AfC. The subject may be notable. Tagged as a "promising draft" requesting MfD discussion instead of letting this abandoned effort slip away as most rejected AfC pages do under G13 Legacypac (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See this t/p thread for some discussion on the relevance of obituaries to thrust anyone to encyclopedic notability......
 * Weak keep His obituary was published in the Straits Times, the leading newspaper in Singapore. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Doesn't look like a promising draft to me. A few drafts are being labeled as Promising draft only because they aren't complete crud.  This is one.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are some bold claims in the article, but there's very little information available online to back them up. The best source available is his obituary, which doesn't qualify as an RS. Brad  v  13:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades Godric  08:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, the obituaries are not suitable sources. Obituaries are great starting points for finding claims and sources, but these are not reliable, and very likely not independent. Delete due to complete failure of WP:Verifiability. If notable, WP:TNT applies, content needs to be based on published sources.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even if this were a Promising draft, it has been abandoned, and neither the author nor anyone else has been working on it. The individual may really be notable, but we don't need to use Promising Drafts as a supplement to the black hole of WP:Requested Articles.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.