Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zack Onisko

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedily deleted. The draft bears a close connection to an earlier draft on the same subject, created by an editor called "Omer Canon". That editor was blocked on 22 September 2019, and the degree of similarity between the two versions is such that the new version has to be regarded as block evasion, CheckUser or none. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Zack Onisko

 * – (View MfD)

This article has been entirely written by a confirmed undeclared paid editing ring. The contributor 's various sock accounts have been blocked. (see Sockpuppet investigations/Arham Tanveer/Archive. This was contributed before any of the accounts wereblocked,so it is technically not a G5 speedy.  DGG ( talk ) 16:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The current author isn't listed as one of the sockpuppets. Should they be added to the SPI, or should they be taken at their word (whatever it is worth) that they really came along and found that the subject didn't have an article?  (If the nominator thinks that the author is another sock, are they about to report them, or is there a reason why they aren't being reported?)  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I've confirmed them by checkuser and added them . There will be more. Other checkusers are following up also.  DGG ( talk ) 19:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.