Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zebronics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. and salt. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zebronics


Article fails WP:N. Editor has failed to heed the advice of several independent editors and has resubmitted the draft without attending to the issues. - as raised by in his Prod tag. Note that drafts cannot be prodded Yashovardhan (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as was repeatedly re created. Also for the concern that the company is trying to contact Wikipedia editors outside Wikipedia. Yashovardhan (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as above. Editor has seemingly ignored concerns and resubmitted without fixing as well as undoing other editors when they make basic corrections to the page. See also this brief discussion. Eagleash (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt The draft has been declined on eight occasions by six different editors. Six of those declines have been because notability had not been established. The references remain mostly corporate announcements. I have not seen any indication of independent, in depth coverage of the company. Despite the editor having has said that they which I take to mean that they've become bored with trying to get the article approved, they have re-submitted again with no significant improvement. Curb Safe Charmer (talk)

The changes havebeen made in references as well as in content mentioned by the senior editors Yashovardhan,Curb Safe Charmer. It can be seen in the history if needed and also i would no longer like to make edits is mentioned because of frustration, the google search engine displays lot of coverages about the company, so i have no clue about what excatly is notablity. I have made 3 article till now, but only 1 got approved i am happy that senior editor like Curb Safe Charmer and Yashovardhanoffered me a valuable advice and don't have any clue about Eagleash - Thank you (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shusilence (talk • contribs) 5:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * "i have no clue about what excatly is notablity" is exactly the problem, . Did you ever read Notability (organizations and companies) as recommended in the decline reason that was provided on eight occasions? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt this just came up on my submissions feed. Stop wasting our time already. I'm marking it rejected again. Legacypac (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Submitted yet again with some more minor disruption. Eagleash (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have requested page protection until this MFD closes. See WP:RFPP. Yashovardhan (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have extended-confirmed protected for 5 days. Lectonar (talk) 13:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as being tendentiously resubmitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.