Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zeeshan Khan (businessman)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [express] || 15:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Zeeshan Khan (businessman)

 * – (View MfD)

Resubmitted after rejection in a spammy form by a disclosed paid editor. The editing history of the page suggests that a WP:G13 deletion seems unlikely as at least one paid editor is continuing to work on the draft past rejection  Java Hurricane  04:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC) I have replied that the place to ask about a page that has been nominated for deletion is in the deletion discussion (this deletion discussion). Robert McClenon (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - See this comment on my talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&type=revision&diff=990579622&oldid=990546610&diffmode=source
 * Comment - There have been two editors working on this draft, User:Sanjaysharma5882 and User:Imdavid21. The first one has not edited in the last few months.  The second one, who asked me the question on my talk page, says that they do not know the first editor, who may or may not be working for the subject.  So the subject of the article is probably using two different paid editors, who are gaming the system by resubmitting the draft with minor changes after rejection, and only asking a question after the draft is tagged for deletion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The author has not followed up within 24 hours after being advised that this was the place to discuss. The author did not really deserve another chance to explain, but I gave them a chance, and they didn't explain.  As per nomination, this is a case of tendentious editing by a paid editor.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Paid editor refusing to drop the stick. SK2242 (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete paid editing with no chance of being accepted.  DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.