Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zenni Optical (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete and salt. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Zenni Optical


Company gnerated content. This has been deleted from mainspace Zenni Optical enough times it has been salted. The draft will not die so bringing for a discussion delete so the future creations can be speedy deleted. I also suggest SALT for the Draft title. Legacypac (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zenni Optical should be read not just because it resulted in a delete last year but because the last creator stated they were contracted by the company to wrote the page. I recall years ago seeing Zenni buying blog posts so this is not surprising. They will never stop. Legacypac (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. The sources are advertising. Tell the author: Only 2-3 sources are needed, but they must be independent third party coverage, and definitely not advertising.  If you can’t find them, no number of more sources will help. I think this company will never have an article.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:SALT - To mostly agree with SmokeyJoe, this company will never have an article as long as they try to submit one via paid editors. The only way that they will get one is if a neutral experienced editor develops one that presents notability, and I am not saying that will ever happen.  Last time, I recommended salting.  I recommend Extended-Confirmed protection, so that a neutral experienced editor can develop a draft, with no promise that that will happen, but that will avoid re-arguing stuff like this.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.