Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zoë Buckman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was history merge with Zoë Buckman as has offered and no-one has disagreed. JohnCD (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Zoë Buckman


Draft for an existing article at Zoë Buckman. It appears to have been copied and pasted from an in progress AFC page for the subject so no history merge is needed. Whpq (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The page history is long and begins with a stub. It does not appear to have been copied and pasted from another page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The draft was blanked on Jul 18 and in the next edit a copy of the mainspace article weas pasted in. -- Whpq (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I see strong similarities between earlier versions of the draft and the later 23:16, 16 July 2015‎ version of Zoë Buckman and infer unattributed use of the work of . Acashman is not in the contribution history of Zoë Buckman.  While it is possible that the similarities are due to use of the same source material, it is best to err on the side of caution to maintain copyright compliance.
 * I recommend a history merge of Draft:Zoë Buckman, versions to 26 May 2015, deleting later versions, with Zoë Buckman, created 20:41, 9 July 2015‎.
 * I note that at 13:21, 18 July 2015‎ is recorded in the history as having performed a history merge.  Possibly Jenks can add to or correct this story?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I did perform a histmerge from a clear cut-and-paste move between User:Allicamp/Zoë Buckman and Zoë Buckman. I also declined to perform a histmerge between Draft:Zoë Buckman and Zoë Buckman, even though it would be (and still is) technically feasible, because there wasn't a cut-and-paste move between the two. There are similarities between the two, but for whatever reason at the time I didn't think it was clear that Allicamp's draft definitely used the earlier work of Acashman1. Looking over it again though, I think I made the wrong decision initially. As you note, there are strong similarities between the two and having dug a little deeper there are even some sentences that were clearly lifted word for word. So, on second thought, I think a histmerge between the two is required. I'll be happy to perform it, but will leave this here for a little bit before pulling the trigger just to make sure everyone else is OK with it. Thanks for pinging me. Jenks24 (talk) 00:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.