Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Drafts by Mehmoodj1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio 11:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Drafts by Mehmoodj1

 * Drafts by Mehmoodj1 – (View MfD)

As has now received an indefinite block from  after continually resubmitting their drafts while ignoring continued talk messages from  and I, I'm now nominating all of the drafts and related pages that they've created for deletion. The vast majority of them are completely unsalvagable, and what few semi-decent ones there are simply aren't worth the effort. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:51, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I believe this nomination includes every draft page that they created, if I missed any then please let me know. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I am aware that there is an argument that suggests that leaving old drafts to moulder for six months is acceptable because there is a process that handles that event semi-automatically, but there is an issue here of potential promotion, even from Draft: space. I think the nomination is possibly tad over-complete in including talk pages sinces those go when an associated Draft is deleted, but the editor was also a tad complex in their prolific creation and re-creation of DRafts and associated material that the completeness is probably important. I perceive a temptation for the editor to come back and continue these drafts in another guise, thereby adding work to the SPI team's heavy caseload if the drafts remain. Fiddle   Faddle  05:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all: There is nothing salvagable here, and no guarantee of G13 after 6 months. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all - The question here is whether to clean up the mess made by a difficult editor now, or later. There is no reason not to delete it now.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.