Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File talk:007CraigbecomingBond.jpg

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted under G8 by. Ebe 123  (+) $talk Contribs$ 11:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

File talk:007CraigbecomingBond.jpg


Talk page for deleted image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 
 * Delete - I don't really see any need to keep this.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 01:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, I think there's some CSD criteria for this one. Too lazy to look it up now tho :) --The Evil IP address (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * G8 - Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  20:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * But I don't think this page qualifies under G8, which states "This excludes any page that is useful to Wikipedia, and in particular deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere..." D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  20:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * How about we subst the text here and then delete the original, then the delete discussion for the image is preserved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's the content
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it. 

The result was to delete the image.

Nothing in this image indicates a non-reproduceable event. I don't see why any new photo of the actor could not be substituted in the article. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The image is highly significant as it was the day when he was officially announced as the new Bond - if I was there and I had a free image I would upload it but I haven't -the image contributes significantly. Surely you don't beleive it is replacable? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 19:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, I believe any photograph of the actor would work just as well in the article. Nothing in the image indicates that he had been announced as the new bond that day. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that the photo is replaceable. Why do we even need a picture of him on the day it was announced?  It's not as though the photo shows anything related to the announcement itself.  Flimsy rationale. Calliopejen1 04:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.


 * Speedy Delete G8. discussion is here now.    Ebe 123   (+) $talk Contribs$ 11:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.