Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File talk:3amdigital.jpg

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 02:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

File talk:3amdigital.jpg

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Talk page of locally deleted file. Tagged with G8-exempt but doesn't actually contain any discussion. See Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 81. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant misuse of G8-exempt. There is literally nothing to keep here. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Changed to Neutral after seeing the arguments from Miniapolis and Diannaa in the 688 Club MfD. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete unless User:Miniapolis can explain within five days why this is useful. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Interesting that !voted "weak keep" several minutes later in an identical discussion. As an admin, I'm tasked with upholding policy until it's changed; the place for that discussion is WP:VPP. (FWIW, I think the WP:F8 criteria should be changed.)  Mini  apolis  00:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - This is what comes of reading one MFD at a time and !voting on them in order. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep with the same reasoning as on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File talk:688 Club logo.jpg – I think these two pages are in identical situations. For what it's worth, there have been two previous discussions about this sort of page at WT:CSD (the one linked in the nomination and this one); I'd judge the former discussion as "no consensus as to whether it's correct to delete these pages or not" and the latter discussion as confirming that. --ais523 21:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.