Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File talk:Rajiv Gandhi (cropped).jpg

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

File talk:Rajiv Gandhi (cropped).jpg


Purely off-topic. I actually couldn't find a CSD criterion that fits; G1 would seem the best fit, but it explicitly excludes partisan screeds. If anyone can find a fitting criterion&mdash;or even is willing to invoke WP:IAR&mdash;then by all means speedy delete it. jcgoble3 (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, no reason to delete - Just blank the page. T  C  N7 JM  01:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The editing tests have removed and replaced by a WikiProject banner as it should be.  TB randley  02:19, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete & Restore in an effort to remove the speedy deletion-qualified edit history. Steel1943  (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand that file's talk page are supposed to be tagged with appropriate WikiProject banners. Are you going to nominate Talk:Family Guy for speedy deletion because the WikiProject banners promote the topic? No.  TB randley  14:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think you saw that I stated "Delete & Restore", meaning bring back everything that is on the page right now, but delete the edit history. Steel1943  (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. I mean, I get the CSD-able edit history, but who's going to dig through the history of a talk page of a legitimate file and say "Whelp! Looks like we should delete this!"? T  C  N7 JM  04:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Answer: Whichever administrator performs the action on this MfD, if this choice is the consensus. Honestly, it does not look like that option is going to be consensus, so why is this stick being passed around? Steel1943  (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That essay did in no way need to be linked to. I asked a perfectly honest question. T  C  N7 JM  04:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I apologize about my use of sarcasm. But honestly, no one, unless that person saw the text previously. When I originally suggested that this be put up for speedy deletion, the text in this article was deleted a few moments before I placed the tag. Since the text is now gone, it makes the talk page seem like it does not apply for any type of deletion. My thought is that the fact that this text is in the edit history can be deemed troublesome, in whole. However, I don't see it being disruptive enough for an WP:OVERSIGHT. However ... if the history were removed, then the WikiProject banner put back in the talk page, that would essentially be the alternative to deletion. Steel1943  (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as edited. Please try first to fix things by editing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.