Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Gallery of October 13, 2006 storm Buffalo, New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Transwiki'd to commons:Category:October 13, 2006 snow storm in Buffalo, New York —  xaosflux  Talk  04:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Gallery of October 13, 2006 storm Buffalo, New York
procedural nomination Originally tagged for deletion via WP:PROD but considered out of scope for PROD. Original reasoning for deletion via PROD was "Wikipedia is not a repository of images." User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 11:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia version. Set up the gallery at Commons, since all the images are already there; that's what Commons is for. The Commmons gallery can then be linked by the Lake Storm "Aphid" and Buffalo, New York articles here. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 11:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and move (if not already done) the images to Commons. Btw, the gallery is in main space so I have no idea why prod (or AFD) couldn't work. Garion96 (talk)12:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Commons as per above. MER-C 12:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Commons Thanks for setting this article straight, Ceyocky. I was the original PRODer, but I should have realized that PROD wasn't applicable. Anyhow, my vote is to move to Commons per everyone above. GlassCobra 16:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think that PROD does apply to anything in mainspace. I'm not sure why this is here. Move it to Commons, by the way, per common sense and the above discussion. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It clearly states at WP:PROD that "Only articles may be proposed for deletion", with an exception for certain cases of User and User talk pages. So images, templates, categories, redirects, dab pages ... these among other things are not articles and therefore out of scope for PROD-based deletion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It was in article namespace though, so it could have been deleted in prod, with the images possibly moved to commons. Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 01:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirects are in article namespace and yet are not articles, for instance. Just because something is in article name space does not mean it is an article. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 11:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * delete I see no need to move this to commons. It uselessly takes up server space.  Digital Ninja  20:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to commons of course.  H2O  23:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Commons. No need to actually delete it. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 05:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.