Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Hipocrite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep but only because page has been replaced, as this account is. — xaosflux  Talk  04:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Hipocrite
Speedy delete because its blank, user inactive so uselessDA PIE EATER (talk) 22:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Userspace is userspace. See WP:PERFORMANCE.--WaltCip (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep users have some leverage in what they can have on their userpage, and they can have it blank if they want to. The fact the user is inactive is irrelevant - that's not a reason to delete it. Hut 8.5 16:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep no reason to delete. It's userspace, it's not like it's doing any harm by sitting there blank. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's just userspace. They're registered; users are allowed (per above) to do what they want with their pages. -- tennis man  20:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep We don't delete the userpages of inactive users simply because they're inactive. Acalamari 20:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.