Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Ischiopagi

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  moo (WP:NAC). — Keφr 05:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Ischiopagi


(When I first nominated this page for AFD, I was unfamiliar with the MFD process; I have since moved the deletion discussion here.) In any case, having read the criteria for deletion of Wikipedia, I do not find this article to be needed, especially when we can summarize the entire article in a few sentences on the conjoined twins page. We do not need individual pages on each type of conjoined twinning, when we have the information on a broader page. The Awkward Axolotl (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No, AFD is actually the right venue. It seems you forgot to type a "2" and got confused by the error message. (Try with WP:TW next time.) — Keφr 20:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Whoops. Thanks for pointing that out. The Awkward Axolotl (talk) 21:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.