Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/K-LOVE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Closed as a duplicate nomination, was already nominated in the proper venue here. I am not an admin. --tjstrf talk 10:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

nom because it is a spammy article in a template spot. JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 05:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 15:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Forgive my ignorance, but are we talking about removing the article from the template namespace, or deleting it entirely? Deletion is a bad idea, as K-LOVE is a huge organization worthy of encyclopedia entry. I thought I had removed it from template usage before because of the logo image... Kc8ukw 05:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

PS: If the problem is just a tiny, poorly written article, I can work on that - once we decide not to delete it. :) Kc8ukw 05:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.