Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Nazism userboxes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy delete, banned user's subpages -- Samir 13:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Nazism userboxes


This is a continuation of the indef block and repeated refused unblock requests here: User talk:Liam G-Veronica B.O.W

Despite the creation of a pro-National Socialist userbox being the sole reason for this block, the offending userbox itself wasn't deleted afterwards.

I make no comment about the unblock requests, the claim that this was merely an objective action to create a userbox for any editors who might feel the urge to use it (It's quietly in use here: User:Schwarzes Nacht), and GF / WP:AGF issues.

A currently-open Mfd on a similar userbox may be relevant: WP:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gr8opinionater/Userboxes/Strasserist
 * Andy Dingley (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete-- to be consistent with the block of this user, these userboxes should be deleted. -- E♴  (talk)  01:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per nom. -- Klein zach  01:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * keep the first delete the second. Why should we allow userboxes for other philosophies but not NS? For the record I'm an anti-facist and anti-nazi libertarian, but I don't see how it's fair to allow someone to identify as other political parties and positions but not this one.  just because some people find it an offensive viewpoint? Some people on the right side of the political spectrum find communism and socialism just as offensive.  That said we don't have political figure userboxes.  We have communism but not stalinism, ect. HominidMachinae (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm speedying these. WP:IAR. Feel free to bring to WP:DRV if you disagree -- Samir 05:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * For the record I'm against speedy abuse in this manner. You've put me in a difficult position, either I have to ignore the fact I think this is censorship or I have to go to DRV to argue for nazis.  It's a rather unfair proposition either way.  Come out defending the undefendable or ignore that speedy criteria really should never be applied if there is a dissenter. HominidMachinae (talk) 06:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Removing extraordinarily divisive userboxes from a banned user's subpage is far from speedy abuse. -- Samir 13:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.