Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Nudity portal subpages

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  archive. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nudity portal subpages

 * Portal:Nudity/Associated Wikimedia
 * Portal:Nudity/Categories
 * Portal:Nudity/Did you know
 * Portal:Nudity/Intro
 * Portal:Nudity/News
 * Portal:Nudity/Nudity-related topics
 * Portal:Nudity/Nudity news
 * Portal:Nudity/Quotes
 * Portal:Nudity/Related portals
 * Portal:Nudity/Selected picture
 * Portal:Nudity/Selected picture/Previous
 * Portal:Nudity/Things you can do
 * Portal:Nudity/Web resources
 * Portal:Nudity/box-footer
 * Portal:Nudity/box-header

Obs .: For admins, not delete the portal, this mfd is about subpages only.

Obsolete and unnecessary subpages.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Archive. The nominator fails to articulate why archiving is not good enough. WP:ATD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * None of these subpages have encyclopedic content that justifies archiving.Guilherme Burn (talk) 14:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - The nominated pages have not been tagged. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - The portal appears to be what is sometimes known as a single-nav-box portal, which does not use the subarticles that have been nominated. There is no harm to be done by deleting them, because they are not used.  There is also no harm done to have them exist.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - The portal had an average of 129 daily page views in calendar 2019. This is a well-viewed portal.  The portal has not been nominated for deletion, but the page views can be reported anyway, even though editors who think that portals have some mystical purpose think that page views are not a useful metric.  The head article had an average of 2811 daily page views in calendar 2019.   Robert McClenon (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Tag the subpages as Historical using Historical template. Sometimes, unused subpages can be used to improve portals, such as in this edit, where I merged content from the Portal:Nudity/Related portals subpage into the portal. The portal previously had no list of related portals; now it does, thanks to the subpage being present as a reference. North America1000 10:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Archive through marking as historical per those above. No pressing reason to delete and have potentially valid uses. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.