Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:A. H. Belo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:A. H. Belo


Not enough here to warrant a separate portal. Two articles, two "images" (with the result that the default view of the portal has twice the current logo, and once the similar old logo, as images), about 1 pageview a day. This is not portal material byb a wide margin. Fram (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this might fall under the intent, if not the rubric, of the speedy criterion. The header article has an orange tag, which should disqualify it. Only one of the other articles is nonstub & non-orange-tagged. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Espresso Addict. Textbook case of unneeded portal. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 21:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the kind of mindless mass creation that needs speedy deletion. What does this add to the article? Wikipedia has 5.7 million articles because people find them useful. If this was Portalpedia the site would have shut down years ago. I don't think any individual company os broad enough of a topic for a portal. Legacypac (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - With 2 articles and 2 images, maybe this gets a booby prize on the way out. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.