Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. El_C 02:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events
Please note that associated pages should be deleted as well:


 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/Did you know
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/Featured Article
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/Intro
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/Topics
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/box-footer
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/box-footer2
 * Portal:A Series of Unfortunate Events/box-header

This portal that has not been touched since its initial creation in July. While there are three non-stub articles on this portal and thus it does not qualify for speedy deletion, there seems to be little hope for its success - the creator and only editor was blocked after an arbitration hearing. BigDT 02:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom and becasue there are no editors actually editing it.` Bakaman Bakatalk  02:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and because it has no context. Cbrown1023 02:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above, with the reservation and because I personally think that the scope of the portal is too small to ever be able to make it a really useful portal. However, I reserve the right to change my opinion based on whether the members of the WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events work to improve the portal over the course of this discussion. Badbilltucker 14:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As a large contributor to WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events. I honestly don't think this project needs a portal. The project is fairly small, and the project page and associated talk page fit our needs. Clamster5 17:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep & update Right now it there seems no reason for it to be kept, but I think it has great potential if it starts to be regularly updated. Pacaman! 18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, unsatisfactory now and no reason to believe it will be improved.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, delete per nom.__ Seadog ♪  00:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same as Clamster.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.