Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ainu

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The arguments to delete this portal (for the most part) revolve around it failing the portal guidelines, however, not satisfying the bar set by WP:CSD (fewer than three non-stub articles). The "keep" vote appears to be based on the fact that it contains more than 3 non-stub articles and appears to evaluate the portal purely based  on P2, without regard for the fact that it is not being evaluated in that strict fashion at MfD since it does not satisfy the P2 criteria. By their very nature, XfDs are a place where pages that fall outside of relevant CSD criteria and require further discussion than is possible with a speedy tag are discussed and either kept, redirected, merged, or deleted.

Based on the information detailed above, I have closed this discussion in favour of "delete." The SandDoctor Talk 13:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Ainu


Such a narrow topic that The Transhumanist ] even tagged for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 03:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete but we need to slow down the manual nomination of portals. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm only nominating ones that X3 will not cover. Legacypac (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Number of non-stub articles in the scope are sufficienct; CSD P2 is not met.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 00:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * P2 is a silly high bar for speedy deletion. This is MfD and this portal fails the portal guidelines even as loose as they are drafted now. Legacypac (talk) 00:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Then why nominate it for speedy deletion under P2? How exactly does it fail portal guidelines?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 01:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not nominate it P2, The Transhumanist did earlier. The same user who created 3500 new portals (off a base of 1500) and has plans to go to 10,000 portals. Another portal that fails sentence one of the WP:PORTAL guidelines "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers.". Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails portal guidelines as overly narrow. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 22:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: far too niche to be a useful portal topic. — Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fram (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.