Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Alexz Johnson

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 19:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Alexz Johnson


It took 11 edits over haf a year to produce a portal with in default view the same image three times, with the same article as "introduction" and default "selected general article", with a "subcategories" section which doesn't even have a category, never mind subcategories, with other selected articles which are tagged for not meeting the notability guidelines (not surprising, as they are demo tapes with little or no reliable sources about them), ... An example of everything a portal should not be. But automated and easy to maintain! Fram (talk) 09:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete One of the worst portals I have ever seen. CoolSkittle  (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete epic failure Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another one-person portal that doesn't have a reason to have a portal. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unlike many other current nominations, this one is indeed too narrow a scope for a portal. Thryduulf (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 19:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. 19:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 19:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's as if there's a competition for the Worst Portal Award. The main article has a long-standing orange-level tag and no category. Most of the articles in the template are redirects to the main article; nearly all of the few that are not, are at least one of stub, orange tagged and/or broadly irrelevant. The template itself is being considered for deletion. This just squeaks by the speedy definition, sadly. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Oddly, this disaster was created after the debate last year in which Wikipedia came fairly close to ditching all portals forever. But regardless, this was surely created by someone who misunderstood what a portal is supposed to be for, which should be evident when only one photo is available and all of the singer's albums have been redirected to her main article because they were deemed non-notable. The main Alexz Johnson article is all the "portal" she needs. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 13:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.