Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bangladesh Premier League (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 23:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Bangladesh Premier League


Another mortal portal, not updated since 2013, and with an average of only 1 pageview per day. Could be archived. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * PS Note that the portal was deleted in January 2013 (see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bangladesh Premier League), then re-created, and MFDed again in February 2013 (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bangladesh Premier League (2nd nomination)). The 2nd MFD closed as "no consensus" after please for a chance to improve it, but the good intentions have clearly not been sustained. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Bangladesh_Premier_League. I think this is the appropriate thing to do to all moribund portals. Redirect to the parent article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all subpages and redirect mainpage to primary article. A stale portal is useless, and on the rare chances something links to this from outside, they'll get a relevant article. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 03:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.