Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Baton Rouge, Louisiana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete. Stifle (talk) 12:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Baton Rouge, Louisiana
This portal is not being maintained. NoVomit (talk) 09:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Aside from being unmaintained, this is an kind of narrow topic for a portal. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Dead portal, too narrow. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unmaintained, and a narrow topic.-- A s hb e y ₮ 14:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Question Why is this portal's content being considered too narrow for inclusion? It seems concern a fairly wide topic. §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  07:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Once you exclude the articles about things which are in Baton Rouge (Category:Buildings and structures in Baton Rouge, Louisiana et. al.) or things which are from Baton Rouge (Category:People from Baton Rouge, Louisiana et. al.), you're left with relatively few articles which are actually about Baton Rouge. Of those, I suspect that most of the really important ones are already linked from Baton Rouge (or should be). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 08:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't make sense to me that we have Featured Portals on cities and they were never called too narrow in scope, yet as soon as one loses maitenance that's what it's labeled. But hey, that's just my thinking and I'm obviously the minority. §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!
 * Delete as unmaintained and duplicating WP:WPLA and P:WPLA. I initially thought that creating the portal wasn't a good idea, but I made some edits to make it look semi-reasonable. It looks like there haven't been many edits since then. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.