Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Battlestar Galactica




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was redirect. @harej 21:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Battlestar Galactica
Dead portal. Only one editor really contributed in this one. Magioladitis (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to WikiProject Battlestar Galactica keeping content intact. Ikip (talk) 18:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect as per Ikip --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 07:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Would we ever need a portal for a tv series? How often will this be updated? Where is the consensus for this portal to be created at the first place? I am sorry but I disagree with the redirect of this one. -- Magioladitis (talk) 04:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree, redirect somewhere; the WikiProject seems a reasonable target. The content should be available if anybody decides to revive the portal. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't you see that the show is over and the subject is to narrow to allow frequent updates? -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Over? With Caprica starting to air in January, there's at least something that is going on with BSG until the middle of next year. However, I still think that it needs redirecting rather than deleting. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There are approximately 300 articles related to Battlestar Galactica, which, if enough to support an entire WikiProject, is more than enough to sustain a portal. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I really don't understand these noms. When a portal is fully developed, even if it isn't being updated regularly, it still takes in a modest amount of hits and directs readers to related articles which may be of interest to the reader. Deleting is obviously inappropriate as then someone will have to duplicate the work (or find an admin to undelete) if they want to resurrect it and redirection doesn't provide much benefit either. Especially given that the links to these will remain in situ. Note left at caretaking WikiProject. –xenotalk 14:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not fully developed. Right now the "What to do" section" is just a copy of a generic one and the portal advertises specific wikia that contain commercials. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * See also Wikipedia talk:Portal. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm the founder of WP:BSG. I knew about this portal but honestly didn't know what to make of it or do with it (and still don't). If there's someone in the project who wants to take it over, sweet, but since it's not an article, and not much (that I can tell) would be lost by its deletion or redirection, I don't much care what happens to it. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  06:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect Incomplete, and questionable relevance per BlueSquad. Redirect allows someone to resurrect it later if motivation strikes. Gigs (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the WikiProject. GrooveDog (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.