Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Berbers

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Portal:Berbers

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Deleted in Miscellany for deletion/Two ethnic group portals. Not a sufficiently identical copy for G4 to apply. Unlikely to become a page that could be of any use to readers, and adding links to this net-negative-to-readers page to Berber articles is a risk that can be averted by deleting. —Alalch E. 22:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - This portal has the old portal architecture relying on subpages which are partial copies of pages. The previous portal had been reworked to have a single-page architecture relying on transclusion.  The reversion to a deprecated architecture is a reason why this portal is not identical to the deleted portal, and is actually inferior to the deleted portal.  This portal also has errors on viewing that display:  "Expression error: Unexpected < operator".  These errors seem to indicate that the portal is unfinished, probably because the originator was blocked for disruptive editing before finishing the portal, and came off block, and was then blocked again for a week, and so has not finished the portal.  However, if the portal is finished, it will still be inferior to the portal that was deleted (and so is not worth finishing).  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment to closer - As a courtesy to, please do not close until 10 April 2024, to allow the originator to respond after coming off the current block. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: somewhat informative— instead of complaining, let's try fixing it. Cremastra (talk) 00:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, portals are useless relics of a far more naive time. There is no use case for this limited-scope portal that isn't served by the actual Berbers page. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete portals with more than one page are outdated. Catfurball (talk) 16:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.