Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bhutan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Bhutan


Abandoned portal. Six selected pictures, four bios and five pics that have not been updated since 2010. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This portal has been abandoned for over eight years and was never completed, which is why all it's sub-pages are littered with red links to never added materials. It clearly fails WP:POG's requirement that portals should be about subjects broad enough to attract large numbers of maintainers and readers. This portal has had over eight years of no maintainers and it had a very low 16 views per day in June and July 2019 (despite the head article Bhutan having 5520 views per day in the same period). Portals stand or fall on their merits in the now, not what could someday hypothetically happen with them, and this one falls flat. I am strongly against allowing recreation, as there is over eight years of hard evidence that Bhutan is not a broad enough topic for a portal. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:33, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and per @Newshunter12.
 * This is a long-abandoned, almost-unviewed micro-portal. WP:POG requires that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" ... and the evidence is that far from having "large numbers" of maintainers, this one has no maintainers. -  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 17:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per analyses by nominator, NH12,and BHG. It doesn't matter whether the country is a broad subject area.  That is an introductory clause.  The result has been no maintenance.   The use of forked subpages makes the lack of maintenance worse.  If someone wants to create a new portal that does not use forked subpages, Deletion Review is thisaway  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.