Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Blog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 15:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Blog
Unmaintained, and originally created by a multiple POV warning recipient who littered the Portal with irrelevant Islamic references. All its subpages should be deleted along with it. Quiddity 18:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. --Quiddity 23:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This page is a usefull portal! It is properly maintained and has usefull links of the blogosphere. There are no reasons for the deletion of this page.84.146.220.34 19:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Single-edit account.
 * Delete failed Portal approvals when they existed. Computerjoe 's talk 20:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep with reservations. Has only been in existence for less than a month. However, it certainly fails miserably on the quality and neutrality areas right now. Badbilltucker 22:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Blogging, and the wikiproject is inactive, and noone claimed interest in maintaining the portal. --Quiddity 03:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I will maintain this portal.DAde 18:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the original creator I mentioned in the nom. -Quiddity 23:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I would request DAde to acquire more experience here. He/She can always begin a better portal conforming to our policies. --Bhadani 10:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotes bad articles. --Improv 23:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete  Jo  e  I  00:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. We do not require a repository of blogs. People come here in search of encyclopedic contents, and we should not directly or indirectly allow contents in contravention of WP:NPOV, verifibaility, and so on.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.