Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cairo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Cairo

 * – (View MfD)

Okay, so this portal is pretty unique to my knowledge. Almost every instance of Transclude list item excerpts as random slideshow uses Outline of Cairo. I was not aware that was something TTH did for some portals created.

Why would TTH do such a thing? Well, simply put because Template:Cairo is not a navbox... it's just a redirect to Template:User Cairo. That means the portal's subtopics section looked like this. I propose we delete with no prejudice to later creating a manually maintained portal. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 01:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Deferring !vote. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Automated portal which draws its "selected articles" list solely from Outline of Cairo.  It is therefore a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of Outline of Cairo.
 * Like @MJL, I was not aware of @The Transhumanist (TTH) building automated portals off Outline pages. The markup used is odd, and broke my previous searches. I now have an AWB run scanning all TTH's portal creations, looking for any other instances.  Good catch, MJL. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 02:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete the intersection of two bad ideas - Outlines and Portals. Legacypac (talk) 03:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete  - Automated portal,  0 subpages, created 2018-09-22 22:22:35 by User:TTH, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing articles and navboxes, and of lower quality: Portal:Cairo. Pldx1 (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per .   SITH   (talk)   12:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Related discussion: WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 24. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Another related discussion: WP:Miscellany for deletion/7 pseudo-portal forks of outline pages. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not aware of any consensus that outlines form an inadequate basis for a portal. I see no reason to automatically prefer an outline to a portal. In principle, it would make perfect sense to delete the outlines in favour of moving the content into the portal. Or just leave both versions where they are, as different ways of presenting an outline of the topic, depending on whether one prefers links or summaries+images (which might depend whether one is logged in or out). Espresso Addict (talk) 04:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My response is found here. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 04:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.