Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Carry On

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. MER-C 09:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Carry On

 * – (View MfD)

Film series with about 37 pages in it's scope. The portal adds nothing to the main article which is a superior navigation portal to this page in portal space and attracts more readers. 202 page views vs 19,428 page views on 30 days. Legacypac (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Another limited-focus portal. This portal is also plain-looking.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment  - Maintained,  1 subpages, -- created 2018-07-04 11:58:04 by User:Waggers, maintained by User:Waggers : Portal:Carry On. Pldx1 (talk) 13:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the films, compilations and TV series, the biographies of the actors must number far more than 37; this is a series of sufficient scope to merit a portal. Being "plain looking" is not a deletion rationale. This portal needs more work - as indeed does the related content - but there's no deadline. WaggersTALK  22:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Actors who have various roles in other films are not totally within tje scope - and if they are notable actors with articles - they will have other roles. Legacypac (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see why that means they couldn't/shouldn't be included. Such tangential information is often of interest to readers, and piquing interest is what portals are all about. W<b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  15:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Film series that does not meet the breadth-of-subject-area requirement of the WP:POG guideline. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Narrow scope fails the WP:POG criterion that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 23:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.