Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Caué

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 19:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Caué


A portal for a 6K inhabitants district of a very small country. A portal with a Lua Error, a redlink as "subcategories", and a staggering 17 pageviews in the last 90 days... Fram (talk) 09:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete red all over. Featured article for me is "Ponta Baleia (Portuguese for "whale point") is a headland and a settlement in the south of Caué District on São Tomé Island in São Tomé and Príncipe. Its population is 43 (2012 census)." Amazing... an article that barely meets WP:GEOLAND and should probably be be up merged to the district page. The creator says he made these in batches, previewing and discarding unsuitable pages. How can that be true if pages like this got past the review?  Legacypac (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hardly worth the delete !vote, but the alternative would be portals that aren't worth it. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. A handful of articles, at least two of which are untagged stubs, and a Lua error because no images are supplied. This should never have been created in this state. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, not worth discussing. —Kusma (t·c) 09:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to a broader portal on São Tomé and Príncipe. While major regions (California, Yorkshire, Irkutsk) are clearly viable portal topics, as are major cities, the divisions of very small island nations are not, but are akin to neighborhood/borough-focused portals which we've been deleting as drilling down too far.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  16:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * , please look at the page source and then tell us what content wish to merge and to which section of Portal:São Tomé and Príncipe you wish to add that content. A redirect is unnecessary if there are no incoming links to this portal. —Kusma (t·c) 22:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * See WP:REDIRECT and WP:RFD. "Must have incoming links" is not a redirect-related rationale. Simply of potential use to readers or editors is sufficient. What to merge is up to maintainers of the larger portal and others who choose to participate in such a discussion. It's possible nothing in it would be retained; I can't predict the future.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You don't see any difference between portal space and article space redirects? —Kusma (t·c) 17:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps scroll through this and indicate what in here could possibly be merged? Right, excatly the same as in 99% of the portals you have voted to merge: nothing. Making one meaningless !vote after another is WP:DISRUPTIVE. Fram (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.