Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Content Management

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Content Management


Just a partial version of the head article with it's navbox. Orange tag and all. Made by a new low edit user with the same templates. Legacypac (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC) So, to be clear, my inability and cofusion at how to correct format the page is why it's going to be deleted? Deane (talk) 13:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - An automated portal, created 2018-12-28T13:08:36Z, only worth of an automated deletion. Pldx1 (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Legacypac is mistaken in saying that it was created by a new user. It was created by an old on-and-off user acting like a new user.  This portal has even fewer features than the usual automated portal.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Not exactly, if you look around the WP:MFD page you will see we are removing all kinds of portals for various reasons. This one has very high view rates (for a portal) of over 400 in 30 days but it is still a fraction of the 5700 views at Content management. This is really just a partial copy of that article with no added value. The article has 125 watchers and is actively edited while the portal is not. This just fails WP:POG and readers are better off at the article. Legacypac (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.