Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Einstein family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Icestorm815  •  Talk  05:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Einstein family
Incomplete, poorly organized portal of extremely limited scope. Portal is related to WikiProject Einsterin family, also currently being considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Einstein Family. Creator of the portal is being informed of this discussion. John Carter (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. With only about 10–15 related articles, the topic is too narrow to support a proper portal. Portal:Albert Einstein would be more viable (see Category:Albert Einstein), but it would be easier and less error-prone to start a new portal than to try to repurpose this one. –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not big enough to deserve a portal. If there were 1000 articles related, then I would support it. Techman224  Talk  20:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Scope is too limited. - Mgm|(talk) 10:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Mgm. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Archive. Probably too narrow to support a proper portal, and certainly not active enough.  No need to suppress history.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Putting aside the question of why an archived version of this portal would be useful, could you specify how (or, more specifically, where) you think it should be archived? Thank you, –Black Falcon (Talk) 17:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aside: Not that it "would" be useful, just that it "could" be useful. Where?  No, not off-hand.  If no one else can either, then delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I wasn't trying to get you to change your mind so much as I was curious about your suggestion of archiving. Anyway, thanks again. –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Much too limited in scope to support a portal. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Far too small of a portal. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 19:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above. South Bay  (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.