Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Explosives

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Explosives


12-year-old abandoned mini-portal. No updates, no maintenance, almost no readers, just a set of a dozen ten-year-old content forks. Known as Portal:Pyrotechnics until it was renamed in May 2019.

Portal created in April 2007‎ by, who last edited in 2011. The lead of WP:POG says "Portals which require manual updating are at a greater risk of nomination for deletion if they are not kept up to date. Do not expect other editors to maintain a portal you create" ... and this one has not been maintained. Sam's last edit to this portal was on 22 April 2007, only 19 days after it was created.

Special:PrefixIndex/Portal:Explosives shows a modest list of sub-pages:
 * Portal:Explosives/Selected article/1, /2, /3, /4 and 5. All were created in July 2009 by User:DJSparky, and each of them is unchanged apart from the move in 2019.  Two further pages Portal:Explosives/Selected article/6 and Portal:Explosives/Selected article/7 have been blank since their creation in 2010 by DJSparky.
 * Portal:Explosives/Selected Biography/1, /2. Both were created in July 2009 by User:DJSparky, and both of them are unchanged apart from the move in 2019.
 * Portal:Explosives/Did you know is just a sea of redlinks. No DYKs listed.
 * Portal:Explosives/Chemicals/1, /2, /3, /4, and /5 were created in July 2009 by User:DJSparky, and each of them is unchanged apart from the move in 2019.

WP:POG requires that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". But in practice, this portal has not attracted maintainers, and it has also been shunned by readers: in Jan–Feb 2019, under its then title Portal:Pyrotechnics the portal got only |Portal:Pyrotechnics 10 page views per day, well below even the abysmal median daily pageview count for all portals of 16 per day. Meanwhile the head article Explosive got 628 daily views and Pyrotechnics got 259 views per day. (BTW, pageviews after the rename to "Explosives" were even lower. In June 2019, the portal got only 2 pageviews per day).

Readers don't read this portal, and editors don't maintain it. Time to just delete it. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per analysis by BHG, with traditional explosives. Silver bullets or weapons of mass destruction will be excessive.  As an illustration of the neglect of this portal and of portals in general, I note that the portal includes a table listing articles on Category:Explosives, including 2 Featured Articles, 4 Good Articles, 16 Class B articles, and 60 Class C articles; but the portal only has 12 articles that have been partially copied, not even 22.  In other words, the portal hasn't been maintained, and that is one of the provisions of the portal guideline.

The related portals are Portal:Chemistry, and Portal:Science, which is a main-page portal.


 * Delete - blow it up. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 10:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.