Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Exton, Pennsylvania

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Exton, Pennsylvania


Fails WP:POG with flying colors. This is the most pointless town portal I’ve ever seen. CDP with population 4842?!? SMH. Also has the dubious honor of less than 1 view/day (10 in last 30 days, 58 in the 7 months it has existed), most of which are probably 1) web crawlers and 2) me seeing how unsuitable this portal is. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 16:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and the creator of this portal spam should explain why they made this. Legacypac (talk) 19:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is worse than even the template makes it appear -- several of the articles refer to the county, not the town, one is redirected to the main town article, and others are stubs (some not tagged as such) or orange tagged. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete with coal Robert McClenon (talk) 18:44, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - This would seem to be too small a community for a portal. There are simply not enough related articles and it looks unlikely that there ever could be. I would also agree with the points Espresso Addict makes above. Dunarc (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to a broader portal on Chester County, Pennsylvania, if possible; otherwise delete. A census-designated place (in this case a sub-township) is too small a geographic division to warrant a portal. While cities and major regions (US states, UK counties, Canadian provinces, Russian oblasts, French departements, etc.) are big enough, CDP cases are basically the same as neighborhood cases in scope, and we're routinely deleting those.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Community consensus has generally been in favor of deleting US county portals. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 22:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.