Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Featured content/Lists/Goldfrapp discography

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Featured content/Lists/Goldfrapp discography

 * – (View MfD)


 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/Gwen Stefani discography
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of Archbishops of Canterbury
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of Canadian provincial and territorial orders
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of counties in Kentucky
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of Lost episodes
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of municipalities of Portugal
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of particles
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of people associated with Jesus College, Oxford
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of popes
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of state symbols of Maryland
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/Nuclear power by country
 * Portal:Featured content/Lists/Periodic table (large version)

Issues with these pages include: Deleting these pages would declutter what-links-here, search box, categories etc. DexDor(talk) 19:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * They have generally not been updated since 2008 (e.g. Portal:Featured content/Lists/Nuclear power by country is out of date).
 * They were copied without attribution.
 * They may be inaccurate (e.g. compare Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of particles with List of particles) or incomplete (e.g. Portal:Featured content/Lists/List of popes lists just 3 popes).
 * They have no significant inlinks (the only inlinks are from a wikiproject's list of pages).
 * Delete. Per nom, nothing worth keeping; incomplete stale abandoned work-in-progress lists with no attribution (and therefore of no use to anybody). Britishfinance (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the nom and @Britishfinance. This stale junk has no use on Wikipedia, so just get rid of it. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.