Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Geert Wilders

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Geert Wilders


Single person portal. He is/was a party leader never Prime Minister. Page contains negative info without sources, which is a BLP problem. Category:Geert Wilders contains less than 20 pages. Islam is a featured article (seriously...) Legacypac (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - While I concur with the argument that this should be deleted as a single-person portal, the stronger argument is that its creator is a banned editor, and was banned primarily for anti-Islamic soapboxing, and the subject of this portal is an anti-Islamic politician. This is not G5 because the editor had not been banned at the time of creation of this portal, but creating things like this portal is what got the editor banned.  We don't need any portals that were created in order to Promote Great Wrongs.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Courtesy ping: portal created 2012-07-28T19:27:47Z by User:JonFlaune. Pldx1 (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * All creators are notified on their talkpages like this . Legacypac (talk) 08:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete not nearly broad enough scope for a portal per WP:POG, Category:Geert Wilders has 9 articles in it.  Hut 8.5  21:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above, and also because it fails WP:POG's requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers".
 * A single politician is not a broad topic, and this one has only 9 pages genuinely within scope.
 * And per that POG guidance about "attract large numbers of interested readers", this one gets on average only 5 pageviews per day. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.