Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Grinspoon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 14:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Grinspoon


Yet another single-edit drive-by creation of an automated portal on a narrow topic, in this case the Australian band Grinspoon. This portal is based solely on the navbox Template:Grinspoon, which includes all 36 articles within the potential scope. The navbox does a much better job because it a) displays all those article titles at once, includes the complete set of links on every page within its scope. The portal is imply an inferior substitute for the head article, and its inferiority is shown by the tiny usage levels: 40 pageviews in 30 days, vs 1895 for the head article.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:31, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A single band is not a suitable scope. Legacypac (talk) 21:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - We don't need individual-band portals. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. An automated portal only worth of an automated deletion. Pldx1 (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.