Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 04:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya


Nominating for deletion, as this portal does not meet the minimum requirements at WP:POG: – North America1000 11:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It's about a rather niche topic
 * Only has 16 related articles (see Template:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya)
 * The portal itself only draws from 7 selected articles (see Portal:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya/Selected article)
 * Has only received 60 page views in the last 60 days (as of this post)
 * Delete and thank-you. Legacypac (talk) 11:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No portals for individual themes.Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep This portal satisfies the minimum requirements at WP:POG: Required. Also move to Portal:Rambhadracharya, in line with the main articles move.-- Auric   talk  12:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * How so? Less than 20 related articles (a very low bar) . Not a wide topic that attracts editors. Viewing stats show it does not attract readers. Legacypac (talk) 15:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * "This page outlines general guidelines and best practices for portals."
 * Required:
 * Introduction ✅
 * Categories – ✅
 * Subportals or Related Portals ✅
 * Topics – ✅
 * Selected article – ✅


 * -- Auric   talk  21:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - It is true that this is a legacy portal, but legacy portals should not be exempt from review, and even one of the portal people is favoring deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - it barely fits in the required criteria but I don't think it can grow/has any potential to grow more than minimum criteria, as all the possible material is already added to the portal.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.