Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jainism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Jainism

 * – (View MfD)

Neglected portal. Six selected articles from 2012. None updated after 2012. Six selected bios: Four from 2012, two from January 2016. Only two selected articles link back to their host article. None of the selected bios do so either. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin. I don't want in any way to prejudge the outcome ... but if you close this discussion as delete, please can you not remove the backlinks?  I have an AWB setup which allows me to easily replace them with links to the next most specific portal(s) (in this case Portal:Religion), without creating duplicate entries. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 09:33, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Portal pageviews in first half of 2019 were 26, as opposed to 3736 for article. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Is User:Mark Schierbecker saying that the content-forked stubs do not provide a way to view the original articles from which they were forked? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Correct. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete and oppose re-creation per the nom and Robert McClenon. Too narrow a topic, not maintained, low readership, which adds up to a clear fail of the WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". The pages are also littered with dozens of references, and the portal is eight articles short of POG's minimum of 20. Newshunter12 (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Jainism

 * Delete as an unmaintained portal with too few articles, and as noted by nominator, forked stubs do not link to articles, leaving them even more disconnected than usual. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and oppose re-creation per Mark Schierbecker and Newshunter12. Fails POG as demonstrated over time. -Crossroads- (talk) 23:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.