Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:James Webb Space Telescope

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:James Webb Space Telescope


Overly narrow scope for a portal, Category:James Webb Space Telescope and the one subcategory contain 12 articles. The portal has had to be bulked out with some other articles of dubious relevance, e.g. Canadian Space Agency is included because they're making one of the instruments on it. This information is better presented in the article than the portal, for instance the images make a lot more sense when displayed next to paragraphs of text which talk about the object depicted.  Hut 8.5  20:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:POG. WP:P2 should be at 20 articles so none of these narrow topics would be created. Legacypac (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is too narrow a topic for a portal. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above, and in view of the fact that the telescope isn't operational yet (literally has had a few screws loose). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:POG epicly. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 14:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to a broader portal, perhaps on space telescopes, or jointly NASA and ESA and CSA portals or whatever. I agree this one doesn't (yet) have sufficient articles for a stand-alone portal, though this may well change pretty soon. I'm not sure it's terribly useful to have separate portals on the JWST, Hubble, and so on, anyway.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.