Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:John Pilger

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 01:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:John Pilger


Same old, same old. Less than 1 pageview a day (46 in 90 days), selected image = image of introduction (only one other image), pool of articles is less than 20, no category, no project. Fram (talk) 11:40, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and WP:POG, not enough content to sustain a portal and categories are required elements of portals.  Hut 8.5  12:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no single person portals. Legacypac (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would be bad enough with all the other stuff, but no category is a deal breaker. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 20:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - All of the usual arguments apply on narrow portals, but no category is not just a deal-breaker but a deal-non-starter. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly not notable enough for his own portal. Lepricavark (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Snow delete per nom. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 20:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.