Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:LOST


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk  04:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Portal:LOST
Orphaned portal, created and edited by a single user, who has stopped maintaining it. Without an active Wikiproject to support upkeep, other editors on Lost (TV series) appear uninterested, as it is redundant to the main Lost articles.--  LeflymanTalk 00:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, kinda hard to find FAs or GAs on one tv-series. feydey 01:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Rillian 01:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, for all the reasons mentioned in the nomination. PKtm 02:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yank  sox  03:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jtrost (T | C | #) 12:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The portal is orphaned, several other portals should be deleted too. Afonso Silva 11:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination (LOST has one GA and no FAs), and because no one uses it and it's just taking up space. --Kahlfin 22:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Zoz (t) 12:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is a distinct lack of worthwhile articles in the portal. Coupled with the fact that it is orphaned, there unfortunately seems to be little hope left for it.
 * Delete per nom. Unmaintainable, not likely to be updated. --Arnzy  (whats up?)  15:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.