Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lake Constance

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Lake Constance


Recently created portal with about 50 pages in Category:Lake_Constance and subcats. However this includes some boats that used the lake, one paragraph pages on streams, one and two line fish articles, and other loosely related content that has been categorized. Just insufficient scope for WP:POG. Our article does a more focused job of exploring this topic. This is reflected in the featured articles that include Hoy_(Lake_Constance), Vogelinsel_(Lake_Constance) and other insignificant islands pulled indiscriminately from the navbox. Not a TTH portal but birthed from his design. Legacypac (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - another mass created navbox portal with insufficient scope. Meszzy2  (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Another portal created by a member of the portal platoon toward the end of the wave of reckless portal creation. This portal is flagged as in need of attention due to errors.  No particular reason why this lake out of hundreds of large lakes needs a portal.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please do not use phrases like "portal platoon" or "reckless" which add nothing to the argument, but simply serve to polarise and inflame those with different views. As it happens, you are wrong - I am not in favour of the creation of mass portals. This is one of very few that I have created using the automated system, primarily to see if it could be made to work, but I don't like it and agree they should be deleted - see my vote below. Bermicourt (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete  - An automated portal, created 2019-01-23T17:49:51Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Lake Constance. Pldx1 (talk) 10:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I created this to test the new auto-templates, but agree it should be deleted, primarily because, if portals are to have real value, they need to be created intelligently and then maintained by the relevant Wiki project team.Bermicourt (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Also per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lake Van Legacypac (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.