Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II


Overly narrow scope for a portal per WP:POG. Category:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II includes 8 articles. The portal also has some articles about sensors and engines used in the F-35 which aren't in that category but it clearly isn't a broad topic.  Hut 8.5  16:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a single jet Legacypac (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't wait until the auto portal makers start creating portals on redirects and article sections. CoolSkittle  (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * User:CoolSkittle they have a better idea Legacypac (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That idea sounds like something that could go very wrong very quickly. Perfect example (alongside the portal shitshow) of how automation can go too far. CoolSkittle  (talk) 23:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm starting to lose the patience and good faith I had at the case request page.  SITH   (talk)   11:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just because creating portals is fun doesn't make them useful. The airplane is useful, but only when there is a properly trained pilot at the controls.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. SMH —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 18:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.