Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Merseyside (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Portal:Merseyside
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G4. It was nominated at the previous MFD "without prejudice to recreating a curated portal", and this is not a curated portal. User:Darrelljon has simply made automated navbox-clone, of the type created in huge quantities by the portalspspammer @The Transhumanist (TTH) and repeatedly deleted at MFD. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)



Delete Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Merseyside, with no prejudice against recreation "of a portal that does this subject justice.", but this version fails that standard miserably: created using the dreaded mass creation template, with all of its well-known lack of maintenance, WP:REDUNDANTFORK and other problems. Not at all clear that Merseyside meets the breadth-of-subject-matter requirements of the WP:POG guideline, not that this is not completely redundant to Portal:North West England. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment – No prejudice against re-creation of a curated portal. North America1000 03:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.