Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nick Jr.

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete any articles that would be useful in the "parent" portal can be added editorially. — xaosflux  Talk 04:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Nick Jr.


Portal on a single cable channel, not even a whole company. Nice red "Lua error in Module:Random_slideshow at line 170: No images found." because perhaps the creator was going so fast to create as many portals they could they did not check their work.

The justification for these indiscriminate creations is:

"That (WP:POG) is totally out of date. That guideline was never followed. People just made portals on what interested them. And, so by the time of the RfC WP:ENDPORTALS in 2018, portals represented a wide range of scope, yet the community decided to keep them all. That set of 1500 portals is the representative set. Portals of similar scope to the portals in that set are okay by the community.  &mdash; The Transhumanist   20:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)" Legacypac (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, if you want to make a portal about a topic without free pictures, you have to think and find clever ways to make it look good anyway, or just not make the portal. —Kusma (t·c) 09:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah but they were "racing against time" to create these. No time to do it right. Legacypac (talk) 10:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Portal:Nickelodeon . The adhominems in the nomination are entirely irrelevant, and fortunately we are not racing against time now so we can get things right this time. In the case of this portal that means merging as the topic is too narrow on its own and there is a broader portal already to which this can be logically merged. Thryduulf (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop being disruptive. The rationals for creating pages are quite relevent. Legacypac (talk) 11:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Another assumption of bad faith and defence of ad hominem arguments? Really? Thryduulf (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop commenting on my comments and focus on the page under discussion and things will go well for you. Legacypac (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete rather than Merge, because this discussion should be without prejudicing a future nomination for Portal:Nickelodeon. A red Lua error is evidence that the portal should not have been created because it was incompletely created.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Portal:Nickelodeon, of which this is just a subtopic. Agree with Thryduulf about the ad hominem comments by nominator in this and so many other of these MfDs. It has a WP:BATTLEGROUND character. Elsewhere, I've suggested this go to ArbCom, as remarkably similar to the WP:ARBINFOBOX crap.  We do not need a "portal war", and the buildup to one is already getting intolerable. I'm thinking of opening the WP:RFARB case myself at this point.  Every time I look it's getting worse and worse.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  20:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Robert McClenon has beaten you to it, see Arbitration/Requests/Case. Thryduulf (talk) 00:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Portal:Nickelodeon, which will improve and expand that portal, making its coverage more complete. North America1000 05:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Can the people who vote to "merge" perhaps indicate what in here can be merged? There are no contents here, only a presentation layer. What is being proposed for deletion is a shell, not content that can be merged. Fram (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a poor portal, and because the "merge" votes are uninformed and unapplicable. Fram (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.