Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nickelodeon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Portal:Nickelodeon


Portal has a very low activity, no one is maintained since. JJ98 (Talk) 09:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep looks fairly complete and functional. As Portals are entry points, I don't see why they'd need to be updated on any sort of frequent schedule -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - portals don't need to be constantly "maintained". It's a complete portal and also receives a fair amount of page hits from Wikipedia readers (see May 2013 statistics). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Northamerica Mediran ( t  •  c ) 08:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.