Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Oz (TV series)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Oz (TV series)

 * -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

This portal is very too narrow and it doesn't show images and this portal topic only shows characters.-- Happypillsjr    ✉    19:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Broken portal. Better covered by Portal:Oz.-- Auric   talk  10:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I found that the portal was tagged with a link to this unclosed deletion discussion, but I can't find any trace of the discussion having ever actually been listed at WP:MFD. So I am adding it to MFD as a relisting, which seems like the least worst way of recovering the situation.
 * Delete lack of scope - single tv series. Also lua error. Legacypac (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, for two reasons:
 * This is is an automated portal, which draws its "selected articles" list solely from the navbox Oz (TV series), of which it is therefore just a bloated and redundant fork. (For a full explanation of why this type  of portal is redundant, see the two mass deletions of similar portals: one, and two, where there was overwhelming consensus of a very high turnout to delete a total of 2,555 such portals).
 * Per the nominator, who is also the creator of the portal, the scope is too narrow to satisfy the WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete:
 * A broken portal that provides a red LUA error on attempting to display a slide show for the image.
 * This portal had 22 page views between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2019. That is total page views, less than 1 page view per day.  The head article had an average of 1494 page views in that period.  No one is using this portal, which isn't surprising when it is an unfinished robot.
 * Automated portals are not useful anyway.
 * With prejudice to re-creation. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: too narrow scope.  SITH   (talk)   12:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.